Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr ho - 灌溉排水学报杂志社投稿_期刊论文发表|版面费|电话|编辑部- 灌溉排水学报

来稿应自觉遵守国家有关著作权法律法规，不得侵犯他人版权或其他权利，如果出现问题作者文责自负，而且本刊将依法追究侵权行为给本刊造成的损失责任。本刊对录用稿有修改、删节权。经本刊通知进行修改的稿件或被采用的稿件，作者必须保证本刊的独立发表权。一、投稿方式： 1、请从我刊官网直接投稿。 2、请从我编辑部编辑的推广链接进入我刊投审稿系统进行投稿。二、稿件著作权： 1、投稿人保证其向我刊所投之作品是其本人或与他人合作创作之成果，或对所投作品拥有合法的著作权，无第三人对其作品提出可成立之权利主张。 2、投稿人保证向我刊所投之稿件，尚未在任何媒体上发表。 3、投稿人保证其作品不含有违反宪法、法律及损害社会公共利益之内容。 4、投稿人向我刊所投之作品不得同时向第三方投送，即不允许一稿多投。 5、投稿人授予我刊享有作品专有使用权的方式包括但不限于：通过网络向公众传播、复制、摘编、表演、播放、展览、发行、摄制电影、电视、录像制品、录制录音制品、制作数字化制品、改编、翻译、注释、编辑，以及出版、许可其他媒体、网站及单位转载、摘编、播放、录制、翻译、注释、编辑、改编、摄制。 6、第5条所述之网络是指通过我刊官网。 7、投稿人委托我刊声明，未经我方许可，任何网站、媒体、组织不得转载、摘编其作品。

Comparing twist-drill drainage with burr ho

作者:

关键词:

摘要：

Objective:The surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH) is still a controversial issue,and a standard therapy has not been established because of the unclear pathogenic mechanisms in CSDH. The intention of this paper is to find a simple and efficient surgical procedure for CSDH. Methods:A retrospective study of 448 patients with CSDH by surgical treatment during 2005 to 2009 was conducted in order to compare the efficiency between two different primary surgical methods, drainage without irrigation in Group A(n=178) and one burr-hole with irrigation in Group B(n=270).The results were statistically analyzed. Results:The reoperation rates in Group A and Group B were 7.9%and 11.9% good outcome rate was 88.8%and 73.5%,the complication was 7.9%and 20.7%in Group A and Group B,respectively. Conclusions:The burr-hole drainage with irrigation of the hematoma cavity is not beneficial to the outcome and is not important in the surgical treatment for in initial treatment,twist-drill drainage without irrigation of the hematoma cavity is recommended because it is relatively safe,time-saving and cost-effective.

文章来源：《灌溉排水学报》网址: http://www.ggpsxbzz.cn/qikandaodu/2021/0105/461.html